Home

Widespread wage theft revealed in SA

Tim DorninAAP
An inquiry has recommended South Australia's parliament adopts an anti-wage theft act.
Camera IconAn inquiry has recommended South Australia's parliament adopts an anti-wage theft act. Credit: AAP

Dishonest and systemic underpayment of wages and the shocking treatment of some workers during the pandemic has been revealed in a South Australian parliamentary inquiry into wage theft.

In its report on Wednesday, the committee said its three-year inquiry uncovered slavery-like practices, including women being forced to work in bikinis, workers forced to repay employers for being sponsored to come to SA and others being threatened if they reported underpayment of wages.

In some cases passports were taken, with workers forced to pay as much as $3000 for their return, while others were confined to a location, labouring for extremely long hours on incorrect awards.

"Wage theft was found to be pervasive across South Australia among vulnerable cohorts of workers, especially those in non-union, casualised, insecure work," the committee said.

Get in front of tomorrow's news for FREE

Journalism for the curious Australian across politics, business, culture and opinion.

READ NOW

"Effectively, wage theft has become the basis of a business model."

Among its recommendations, it proposed the creation of a South Australian Wage Theft Act that would criminalise the most dishonest, systemic, and deliberate underpayments with punishments including fines and jail time in extreme cases.

Chair Irene Pnevmatikos said the committee recognised there was no one way to fix wage theft.

"There is significant work to be done to improve current structures as well as the need for new and stricter state and federal legislation," the Labor MP said.

But in a dissenting report, Liberal MP Heidi Girolamo said she did not support the creation of a state act, arguing changes to the industrial relations system should be made at the federal level.

Ms Girolamo said she strongly condemned any employer who did not comply with the law in relation to wages and conditions, describing such action as "un-Australian".

However, she questioned the frequent use of the term wage theft.

"It is a highly emotive, loaded and misleading term which can mischaracterise hardworking small business owners who make genuine, accidental errors or miscalculations," she said.

"Such miscalculations or errors are often due to the complexity of the national system."

SA Unions secretary Dale Beasley said wage theft was costing SA workers $500 million a year and was also an issue for those small businesses doing the right thing.

"These small businesses simply can't compete with unscrupulous businesses who are breaking the law by deliberately underpaying their workers," he said.

Flinders University criminology researcher Marinella Marmo said expecting victims of severe exploitation to stand up and speak for themselves was unrealistic, particularly for migrants.

"While many may encounter exploitation, they don't have the tools to recognise it or to apply the correct terminology against it," Associate Professor Marmo said.

During its investigation, the SA committee also found issues with the payment of workers under the JobKeeper scheme instigated by the federal government at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

It heard evidence of workers being directed to clean their employer's house to make up the difference between their normal wage and the $750 JobKeeper payment, a worker being asked to sacrifice 10 per cent of their salary to help keep a business afloat, and workers being directed to take leave entitlements even though their employer was receiving JobKeeper payments.

Get the latest news from thewest.com.au in your inbox.

Sign up for our emails